Conflict-Zone Liability Beyond Sanctions

LaFarge Ex-CEO Gets Six Years

Posted 4/22/26

A Paris criminal court’s conviction of Lafarge and eight former executives sharpens a compliance lesson already underscored by the company’s 2022 U.S. guilty plea: payments framed as security, transit, or operating costs in a war zone can be recast by prosecutors and judges as terrorism financing, sanctions evasion, and senior-management misconduct when a company chooses to keep business running under armed-group control. 

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

Log in