In March, the Justice Department will have another chance to argue that U.S. encryption export controls are in fact constitutional--a case that it failed to make after a federal three-judge panel in May ruled in favor of Professor Daniel Bernstein, who maintained that the controls amount to prior restraint of free speech. The Clinton administration can help its lawyers by fashioning a Constitution-friendly encryption decontrol, which is scheduled for release by Dec. 15.
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, below, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a current subscriber, and had an account on our previous site, you already have an account. If you have not yet logged into our new site, click here to reset your password.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |